Skip to content
Distr
Book Demo Start free trial Login

Container Registry Comparison 2026: 12 Options Ranked

Jake Page
Jake Page • Software Distribution Specialist

12 container registries compared: Docker Hub, ECR, GCR, ACR, Harbor, JFrog, GitHub, GitLab + 4 more. Pricing, self-hosting, open source, and scale.

5 minute read Copy URL
Container Registry Comparison 2026: 12 Options Ranked

Software developers have a wide range of container registry options today, whether they’re pushing containers into their own infrastructure or sharing artifacts with external customers.

Not every OCI registry exists for the same reason. Some are built for internal use, closing the loop between developers, CI/CD pipelines, and deployments inside a single organization. Others are designed for external distribution, helping software vendors get artifacts into customer environments, often across security boundaries or into air-gapped networks.

This post walks through the main registry options and looks at how each handles real-world software distribution.

First, some terminology.

Terminology

  • Registry: A service that stores and distributes container artifacts. Examples include private Docker image registries, OCI registries, and the proprietary registries covered below.
  • Artifact: Can mean a few things, but here it refers to an OCI-compliant image.
  • Container Image: A specific type of artifact, made up of manifests and blobs.
  • Digest: A unique identifier for a specific version of an artifact, typically a SHA256 hash. Immutable by design.
  • Tag: A human-readable label for a specific version (latest, v1.0, etc.) that points to a unique digest. Immutable tags in a registry mean the pointer cannot be repointed after the fact.
  • Manifest: Metadata describing how blobs combine to form a container image. Manifests can reference other manifests for multi-arch images.
  • Blob: The actual data of an artifact, most commonly an archive of files.
  • SBOM (Software Bill of Materials): A list of components and dependencies in a software build. Usually added directly as a layer on the OCI image.
  • Image Signing: Cryptographic verification of image integrity and authenticity. The signature can be integrated directly into the OCI image.
  • OCI Compliance: Adherence to Open Container Initiative standards so that OCI-compliant containers move cleanly across platforms.

What Is a Container Registry?

A container registry is the service software developers use to store, manage, and distribute container images and related OCI-compliant artifacts. It exposes APIs for pushing and pulling artifacts and is mostly consumed by CLI clients running in CI/CD pipelines or deployment targets. Mature registries add access control, analytics, and a UI on top.

For a deeper dive, including the difference between registries and repositories, see our complete container registry guide.

Understanding the OCI Format

OCI (Open Container Initiative) compliance ensures container images and artifacts behave consistently across platforms and tools. The OCI standardizes image formats, distribution methods, and runtime specifications. The result is portability and freedom from vendor lock-in.

Common tools like Helm, Docker, and ORAS all push and pull OCI-compliant artifacts. A growing pattern is using ORAS to package non-OCI-native formats (Kubeflow pipelines, configuration bundles, ML models) as OCI artifacts.

For example, a machine learning model can be pushed like this:

Terminal window
oras push registry.distr.sh/my-org/ml-model:0.0.1 ./model.pkl:application/vnd.myorg.model

For a full explanation of OCI specifications, compliance requirements, and conformance testing, see our complete guide to OCI container registries.

Key Considerations When Choosing a Registry

When evaluating registries, focus on a handful of core criteria.

Internal vs. external use. Is this for your internal dev team’s workflow, or for distributing to customers? This is the most fundamental distinction and drives most of the other requirements.

OCI compliance level. How completely does the registry implement the OCI specification? This affects the artifact types you can store and distribute.

Security and access controls. For internal use, integration with your existing IAM is usually enough. For external distribution, you need granular controls over which artifacts are visible to which customers. Vulnerability scanning and image signing matter too. See our container registry security best practices for more.

Deployment flexibility. Can the registry be deployed where you need it? Cloud, on-premises, air-gapped environments? See our container registry use cases guide for more.

Support. Does the registry have a strong community behind it, or a commercial vendor standing behind it?

List of private (internal) container registries

Internal registries are built primarily for trusted, in-house use. They integrate tightly with cloud services, IAM, and CI/CD pipelines to support internal engineering teams.

They shine when development and deployment happen inside the same security boundary, with no external customer access required.

The trade-off is usually fewer knobs: limited UI, simpler access control, fewer analytics.

Azure Container Registry (ACR)

ACR

Azure Container Registry (ACR) lets users store artifacts in a default global namespace or organize them in more detail using the supported repository structure. Microsoft’s scale brings some compelling extras: global image replication, and built-in automation for building and patching images. Vulnerability scanning is there too, reportedly through an Aqua Security integration, though most of the documentation on that lives in Aqua’s docs rather than Microsoft’s.

Key features:

  • OCI v1.1 compliant with strong Azure integration
  • Supports specialized artifacts (WASM modules, Bicep files, ML models)
  • Built-in Azure policy management and security
  • Pricing transparency
  • Automated container building and patching

AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)

ECR

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) supports both private and public repositories and ties into AWS services nicely. Standout features include lifecycle policies for image management, automated vulnerability scanning, immutable tags, and cross-region replication. Access control runs through AWS IAM. A good fit for AWS-centric workflows, with high availability and durability out of the box.

Key features:

  • Private and public repositories
  • Automated vulnerability scanning
  • Built-in lifecycle policy management
  • Powerful (though sometimes complicated) access control via AWS IAM

Google Artifacts Registry (GCR)

gcr

Google Artifact Registry succeeded Google Container Registry and unified the handling of container images and non-container artifacts (Maven, npm, OS packages). It integrates with Google Cloud services (Cloud Build, Deploy, GKE) and supports fine-grained IAM, CMEK encryption, and regional or multi-regional setups.

For users transitioning from Google Container Registry, Artifact Registry offers improved features and broader artifact-type support.

Key features:

  • Multi-format support
  • Custom security and access control, including customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) for individual repositories
  • Regional and multi-regional repositories

Oracle Container Registry (OCR)

Oracle Container registry

Oracle Container Registry is a managed service for storing and sharing container images with support for public and private repositories. It integrates with Oracle Cloud IAM for access control, supports multi-architecture images, and provides high availability through replication. It works well inside Oracle Cloud workflows, pairing with tools like Kubernetes Engine and Visual Builder Studio.

Key features:

  • Private and public Docker registries
  • Multi-architecture image support

JFrog Artifactory

jfrog

JFrog Artifactory is a heavyweight in the registry product catalog. It’s both a registry and a universal repository manager, supporting 30+ package formats.

Instead of a unified registry space, each format typically gets its own dedicated repository. Pricing varies by scale and feature set, but Artifactory remains one of the most comprehensive options for internal registries.

It supports three repository types:

  • Local, for internal artifacts
  • Remote, for caching external sources
  • Virtual, which provides unified views across local and remote repos

Artifactory layers in enterprise features: OCI v1.1 compliance, a proprietary query language (AQL), CDN integration, and fine-grained access control for large-scale distribution.

Key features:

  • Deploy on-prem or in the cloud
  • Full OCI-compliant registry with Referrers API support
  • Universal artifact management across multiple formats
  • Advanced artifact tracking, dependency management, and caching
  • Image vulnerability scanning and security features
  • Proprietary query language (AQL)
  • Artifactory cloud + CDN distribution

GitLab Container Registry

gitlab

GitLab Container Registry is part of the GitLab suite and fits neatly into GitLab CI/CD. It’s still progressing toward full OCI compliance, making it a sensible pick for teams already deep in the GitLab ecosystem. Webhook integrations allow for more automation-heavy workflows.

Key features:

  • Can be self-hosted
  • Tight integration with GitLab CI/CD for build, test, and deployment
  • Webhook support for automation and external integrations
  • Built-in image and repository management via the GitLab UI
  • Good fit for teams already using GitLab for version control
  • OCI compliance in progress

Cloudsmith

cloudsmith

Cloudsmith is a SaaS-based package management platform that supports OCI v1.1, so container images can sit alongside other package formats. A unified policy management engine simplifies enforcement across artifact types. Cloudsmith tends to come up in more complex software distribution scenarios, with features like ML model tracking.

Key features:

  • OCI v1.1 compliance
  • Unified policy engine across artifact types
  • ML model tracking support
  • Scalable, cloud-hosted (SaaS) solution
  • Works well for complex, multi-format distribution scenarios

Mirantis

Mirantis

Mirantis Secure Registry (MSR) is an enterprise-grade private container registry aimed at hardening the software supply chain. Unlike public registries, MSR offers a secured environment for storing, sharing, and managing container images, with controls designed to ensure only approved and trusted images land in development and production.

Key features:

  • Role-based access control (RBAC)
  • Image scanning
  • Image signing
  • Caching and mirroring
  • Image lifecycle management
  • High availability configurations
  • Exportable health metrics

Recent announcement: Mirantis moved the open-source core of MSR to CNCF Harbor. Rather than continuing to develop its own registry independently, Mirantis now builds MSR on top of Harbor.

Harbor

Harbor is a robust open-source container registry. Administrators can organize repositories into projects (either public or private), with access controlled through RBAC.

Harbor supports full OCI v2.0 compliance and goes beyond basic container management to include vulnerability scanning, image replication, and automatic SBOM generation on push. The feature depth and security tooling make it a popular pick in enterprise environments.

harbor

Key features:

  • Full OCI v2.0 compliance
  • Extensive artifact support: CNABs, OPA bundles, and user-defined OCI artifacts like ML models
  • Enterprise security: vulnerability scanning, image replication, advanced access control
  • Supply chain security: auto-generated SBOMs on push

Gitea

gitea

Gitea is a lightweight open-source platform that bundles a container registry with its code hosting capabilities. It supports basic OCI compliance and covers the common cases of Docker images and Helm charts within the Gitea ecosystem. A solid fit for smaller projects or teams already running Gitea for version control. Authentication uses personal access tokens, which makes private-registry access easy to manage.

Key features:

  • Basic OCI compliance, supporting OCI-compliant image publishing
  • Integration with Gitea code hosting
  • Lightweight and easy to run
  • Personal access token authentication

GitHub Container Registry

github

GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) is GitHub’s OCI-compliant registry, alongside GitHub Packages. It’s optimized for teams already managing code and automation through GitHub, with fine-grained permissions tied to GitHub repositories and GitHub Actions driving publishing and consumption of container images. Most of the value shows up on open-source projects.

Key features:

  • Full OCI support for container images
  • Tight integration with GitHub Actions for automated image builds
  • Fine-grained permission management tied to GitHub repos and orgs
  • Namespace-scoped images using GitHub user/org paths
  • Supports Helm charts and other OCI artifacts

Docker Hub

docker hub

Docker Hub is the default public registry for Docker images and one of the most widely used registries in the container ecosystem. Tight integration with the Docker CLI and a huge catalog of public images from official vendors and community publishers make it a convenient on-ramp for development. Rate limits and the security concerns that come with public registries often push teams to reserve it for base images or non-sensitive workloads.

Key features:

  • Native integration with Docker CLI and Docker Desktop
  • Public and private repositories
  • Automated builds and webhooks for CI integration
  • Official and Verified Publisher image libraries
  • Rate-limited anonymous access (login recommended for better limits)

List of container registries that support external users

External registries face a different problem: distributing software to end customers, almost always outside your own organization. The priorities shift to access control, auditing, version visibility, and compliance. For more on the unique challenges of customer-facing container registries, see our guide to container registries for software distribution.

GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub are excellent for open-source and low-security use cases, but they fall short for commercial software distribution because they lack:

  • Granular access control. No way to give specific customers access to specific artifact versions.
  • Air-gapped support. Limited options for distributing to high-security environments.
  • Usage visibility. Missing audit logs and download tracking that commercial vendors need.
  • License management. No built-in capability to manage software entitlements.

Purpose-built external registries like Distr exist to cover these gaps for vendor-to-customer distribution.

Distr

Distr OCI registry

Distr ships with an OCI-compliant artifact registry built natively into the platform.

Distr itself is fully open source on GitHub and can be self-hosted. It provides a vendor portal where software and AI companies manage artifacts, invite end customers, and control licenses and access policies down to specific tags of an image or version of an application.

There’s also a customer portal where end customers see available artifacts and generate access tokens to pull from the registry.

Key features:

  • Vendor and customer portals
  • OCI-formatted and OCI-compliant artifact support (Helm, Docker, etc.)
  • Built specifically for commercial self-managed deployment options for software and AI companies
  • Advanced features: artifact tag restrictions, usage tracking, and granular access controls
  • Available as a managed service (SaaS) via Get Started, or self-managed
  • Open source and free to use

Who it’s for:

Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), B2B platforms, and enterprise software teams that distribute commercial software into customer environments, especially air-gapped, self-managed, or regulated deployments.

Comparison Table

RegistryManaged serviceCan be self-managedGreat support for external users
Gitea❌️✅️❌️
Harbor❌️✅️❌️
Docker Hub✅️❌️❌️
GitLab CR✅️✅️❌️
GitHub CR✅️❌️❌️
JFrog Artifactory❌️✅️✅️
Azure CR✅️❌️❌️
AWS ECR✅️❌️❌️
Google CR✅️❌️❌️
Oracle CR✅️❌️❌️
Cloudsmith✅️❌️❌️
Distr✅️✅️✅️

Which container registry fits your needs best?

  • Enterprises using artifacts internally. JFrog Artifactory or Harbor for large organizations running complex internal workflows. Both offer robust access controls, multi-format support, and policy enforcement at scale.
  • SaaS vendors hosted on a single cloud with no self-managed need. If your infrastructure sits inside one specific cloud, use that provider’s container registry.
  • Non-commercial open source projects. GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub for distributing public artifacts to a wide audience with minimal setup. Straightforward to adopt, compatible with standard tooling, widely known.
  • Commercial open source and SaaS vendors that want to offer self-managed deployment options. Distr is built for software vendors distributing artifacts into external customer environments, including regulated, self-managed, and air-gapped deployments. Granular access controls, usage tracking, and flexible deployment models that internal or public registries don’t provide.